Chandan Gupta v. State Of NCT Delhi

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 569/2016 CHANDAN GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through:

(appearance not given) versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Sahi Ram PS Sangam Vihar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 01.04.2016 Crl.M.A.No.4481/2016 (for exemption) 1.

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2.

Application stands disposed of accordingly.

BAIL APPLN. 569/2016 1.

By way of this second application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., petitioner is seeking bail in case FIR No.722/2015 registered under Sections 307/506/34 IPC & Section 25/27 Arms Act at PS Sangam Vihar. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record copy of order dated 03.03.2016 in Bail APPL.No.70/2016 passed by a coordinate Bench observing as under:

"Counsel for the petitioner has also drawn attention to the Memorandum Of Understanding dated 20th January 2016, arrived at between the complainant parties of both the FIRs (721/2015 & 722/2015), recording that with the passage of time and with interference of well wishers and respectable persons of societies, number of meeting were convened to bring

back peace and harmony in the society among the parties and since both the parties are known to each other and they were in their tender age, so there elders and respectable members of the societies entered into their personal grievances and both the complainant parties are agreed to live in neighbourhood peaceful".

3.

In view of the above settlement between the parties and release of the accused on bail in cross case i.e. FIR No.721/15, under Sections 307/506/34 IPC and section 25/27 Arms Act at PS Sangam Vihar, this Court deems it fit to grant the bail to the appellant Chandan Gupta. He is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of concerned Trial Court and subject to the condition that the petitioner shall not leave the country without the permission of the Court.

4.

This application stands allowed.

5.

Any observation made herein for purpose of granting bail to the petitioner shall not be deemed to be an expression on the merits of the case. 6.

Copy of this order be given dasti under the signature of Court Master. PRATIBHA RANI, J.

APRIL 01, 2016 'afa'