Parvez Ahmed v. State ( Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

$--36 & .

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1466/2018 PARVEZ AHMED Petitioner Through Ms. Roopa Nagpal, Advocate.

versus STATE ( GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents Through Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State.

SI Mukesh Yadav, PS Jagatpuri.

+ CRL.M.C. 1477/2018 HAMID ALI & ORS .....Petitioners Through Mr. Vijay Kinger, Advocate.

I '

versus STATE ( GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State.

SI Mukesh Yadav, PS Jagatpuri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

ORDER

% 22.03.2018 Crl.M.A.5335/2018 (exemption^ in CRL.M.C. 1466/2018 CrI.M.A.5365/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 1477/2018 - Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1466/2018 & CRL.M.C. 1477/2018 1.

The petitioner in Crl. M.C. 1466/2018 seeks quashing of FIR No.239/2013 under Sections 354/451/509 IPG, Police Station Jagat Puri. Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 1477/2018 seeks quashing of FIR CRL.M.C. 1466/2018 & page l CrI.M.C.1477/2018 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

No.231/2013 under Sections 323/354/506/509/34 IPG, Police Station Jagat Puri. The subject FIRs are cross-FIRs.

2.

It is contended that at the relevant point of time, the parties were neighbours and the subject FIRs have been registered over a quarrel that took place between the parties on a trivial issue. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the disputes between the parties have been settled and they have entered into a settlement agreement • dated 22.02.2018 through the process of mediation, held at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.

4.

Parties are present in person, represented by respective counsel and identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have settled all their disputes. They further submit that they do not wish to press their respective complaints.

5.

In view of the fact that disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would also be expedient to quash the subject FIRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

6.

In view of the above, the petitions are allowed. FIR No.239/2013 under Sections 354/451/509 IPG, Police Station Jagat CRL.M.C. 1466/2018 & • Page2 Crl.M.C.1477/2018

Puri and FIR No.231/2013 under Sections 323/354/506/509/34 ,IPG, Police Station Jagat Puri and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.

7.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJl^V SACHDEVA, J MARCH 22, 2018 st CRLM.C. 1466/2018 & PaaeS Crl.M.C.1477/2018