Doodhnath v. State

$~38 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 976/2018 DOODHNATH ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Roshan Lal Saini, Advocate with Ms.Kavita Saini, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Jamal Akhtar, proxy counsel for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel.

SI Shekhar, PS Gulabi Bagh.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 06.04.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of two months. 2.

Nominal Roll dated 14.03.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 376 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `18,000/-. Crl.A. 696/2000 was dismissed by this Court on 20.05.2016. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone six years, five months and nineteen days incarceration besides remission for five months and three days as on 13.03.2018. It further reveals that he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. Earlier he was granted parole and there are no allegations of its misuse.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J.

APRIL 06, 2018 / tr