Ajay Sharma & ORS v. State Of Delhi & ANR

$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1468/2018 & CRL.M.A. 39885/2019 AJAY SHARMA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. K.S. Tyagi, Advocate

Versus

STATE OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Sushil Singh, P.S. Jafrabad Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate with respondent No. 2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 04.02.2020 1.

The present proceedings are instituted seeking quashing of FIR No. 306/2015 under Sections 406/498A/354/506/34 IPC registered at Police Zafrabad, Delhi on the ground that parties have settled their disputes. 2.

Learned APP for the State submits that besides the present petitioners the charge-sheet was also filed against one Amit Tyagi (brother-in-law), who has since expired. He further submits that respondent No. 2 is the only complainant/victim.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that cost of Rs.2,500/- imposed vide order dated 03.02.2020 has been paid to respondent No. 2. 4.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have arrived at a settlement out of Court. Learned counsel for respondent No. 2, on instructions, submits that respondent No. 2 has received full and final CRL.M.C. 1468/2018

settlement amount. In terms of the settlement, respondent No. 2 is now left with no claim whatsoever against the petitioners. 5.

The petitioners and respondent No. 2 who is present in person are identified by their respective counsel and the Investigating Officer. 6.

Respondent No. 2 who is present in Court, submits that she has entered into the settlement with her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties are bound by the statements made in Court today. 9.

In view of the above and the fact that the parties have amicably settled their disputes, no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the criminal proceedings against the petitioners. It is accordingly directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

10.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith pending application.

11.

Order dasti to the counsels for the parties.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 04, 2020/p'ma CRL.M.C. 1468/2018