Vipin Sehgal v. State (Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

$~2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1083/2016 and Crl. M.A. no. 4640/2016 VIPIN SEHGAL ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Pravir K. Jain, Adv.

versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 10.07.2017 During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that trial court may be directed to permit the petitioner to lead additional documentary and ocular evidence.

It is noted that defence evidence is complete and petitioner has already filed an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. before the trial court along with the documents. Accordingly, no directions are required to be passed in this petition. Trial court shall dispose of the application of the petitioner expeditiously and in accordance with law.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

JULY 10, 2017/rb