Mayur Khade v. Government Of NCT Of Delhi
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 4468/2024 MAYUR KHADE .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Akhilesh Lakhanlal Kamle, Adv.
versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State.
SI Sandeep ARSC Crime Branch Shakarpur, Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R
% 09.05.2025 CRL.M.A. 14508/2025 (Exemption) 1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.A. 14507/2025 3.
The present application has been filed by the applicant/petitioner under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India seeking modification of the bail conditions imposed vide Order/Judgment dated 17.04.2025 passed by this Court in FIR No.30/2023 dated 10.02.2023 for the offence under Section 20 of the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 („NDPS Act‟) registered at Police Station Crime Branch.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a permanent resident of Mumbai, therefore, it is difficult for him to appear on every Saturday at 4:00 PM before the SHO/IO Crime Branch, Delhi.
5.
He further submits that vide bail conditions nos.(i), he has also been directed not to leave the NCT of Delhi without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. He submits that the petitioner though has been granted relief of the bail but he is facing much hardship and he has not been able to leave Delhi and he has no place to live in Delhi. He submits that in these circumstances, the Order dated 17.04.2025 be modified to the above extent.
6.
It is apposite to mention the relevant bail conditions of the Order dated 17.04.2025 as under:
i.
The Petitioner shall not leave the NCT of Delhi without prior permission of the Learned Trial Court.
ii.
The Petitioner shall report at P.S. Crime Branch, Delhi every Saturday at 4:00 P.M. The concerned officer shall release the Petitioner after recording his presence and after completion of all the necessary formalities.____________ 7.
The learned APP for the State submits that he has no objection in case the petitioner is directed to report every Saturday before the local Police Station, Mumbai near his residence. 8.
In view of the above, the Order dated 17.04.2025 with respect to the conditions (i) and (ii) is modified with the following conditions: The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
i.
The Petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Learned Trial Court.
ii.
The Petitioner shall report at local Police Station near his residence, Mumbai every Saturday at 4:00 P.M. The concerned officer shall release the Petitioner after recording his presence and after completion of all the necessary formalities.
9.
However, the other conditions imposed vide Order dated 17.04.2025 with respect to (iii) to (viii) shall remain same. 10.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to typographical error, the correct name of the counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Akhilesh Lakhanlal Kamle was inadvertently typed as Mr. Akhilesh Lakhalal Kamle.
11.
Let the appearance in the present order of learned counsel for the petitioner be read as the appearance in the Order/Judgment dated 17.04.2025 also.
12.
In view of above directions, the application stands disposed of. SHALINDER KAUR, J MAY 9, 2025/ab/kp Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.