Raj Kumar Gupata v. Delhi Development Authority

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3646/2012 RAJ KUMAR GUPATA ..... Petitioner Through:

Counsel for the petitioner (appearance not given) versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr. Ashutosh Koushik and Mr. Brahm Kumar Pandey, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

O R D E R

% 06.03.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks waiver/reduction of the costs imposed vide the order dated 14th November, 2018. The reasons for imposing the said costs is reflected in the said order, and no case, for reduction or waiver thereof can be said to be made out.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks, at this stage, four weeks further time to deposit the said costs. The request is reasonable. Accordingly, subject to payment of costs, as per the order dated 14th November, 2018 within a period of four weeks from today, the writ petition would stand restored to its original number. Renotify the writ petition on 16th May, 2019. C.HARI SHANKAR, J MARCH 06, 2019/kr