Surender @ Jeetu v. State

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + SURENDER @ JEETU ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Aditya Swaroop Aggarwal, Advocate for MR.Rahul Mehra, St.Counsel for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 22.04.2016 1.

The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner from jail seeking parole for a period of three months on the ground of re-connecting social ties with his family and society.

2.

Status report has also been filed by the State verifying the address of the petitioner to be correct.

3.

Heard.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner had made representation to the Respondent/State praying for grant of parole which has been rejected by the Respondent vide order No.F.18/70/2015/HG/797 dated 16.02.2016.

5.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that the petitioner is seeking parole for maintaining social ties and as per Parole/Furlough

Guidelines 2010, one of the objectives of framing the said guidelines was 'to protect social ties'. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of parole to the Petitioner to enable him to reconnect social ties with his family and society.

6.

On behalf of State, it is submitted that appropriate order may be passed keeping in view Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010 issued by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. 7.

In the nominal roll, the overall jail conduct of the Petitioner as well as his jail conduct in last one year is mentioned as 'Satisfactory'. 8.

Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, the prayer for grant of parole is allowed to the extent that the Petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent and subject to the following conditions:- (i) During the period of parole, the Petitioner shall report to the Duty Officer, P.S. Subzi Mandi, Delhi on every Monday at 10 AM. (ii) The Petitioner shall keep the SHO, P.S. Subzi Mandi, Delhi informed about his place of residence in Delhi and his contact numbers i.e. mobile, landline or both. It would be open to the concerned SHO to verify the address and the contact numbers and to seek cancellation of parole in case it is found to be incorrect.

(iii) During the period of parole, the Petitioner shall not cross Delhi border.

(iv) During the period of parole, the Petitioner shall not try to contact the witnesses in any manner whatsoever.

(v) While submitting the bail bond, he will furnish to the Jail Superintendent the address of the place where he would reside in Delhi during the period of parole as well as the contact numbers. 9.

It is, however, made clear that on expiry of the parole period, the Petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent, who shall submit the surrender report to this Court. 10.

Writ Petition stands allowed in the above terms. 11.

The Petitioner be informed through the Jail Superintendent about the order passed.

Order dasti.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

APRIL 22, 2016 'st'