Rajwati & ANR v. The State Gnct Of Delhi & ANR

$-32 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2645/2018 RAJWATI & ANR Petitioners Through:

Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv. along with petitioners in person.

versus THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through:

Mr. M.S. Oberoi, AFP with SI Pankaj Thakral, P.S. Burari.

Respondent no.2 in person.

AND CRL.M.C. 2672/2018 ANGURI DEVI & ORS Through:

Petitioners Mr. Ram Kumar Sharma, Mr. Vinod Kumar, Mr. Atul Kumar and Mr.

Ashok Chauhan, Advs. along with petitioners in person.

versus STATE & ORS Respondents Through:

Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP with SI Pankaj Thakral, P.S. Burari.

Respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

% 17.05.2018 By these petitions it is prayed that cross-FIRs may be quashed in view of the settlement. Details of the cross-FIRs are as follows :- 1) FIR No. 373/2011 under Sections 323/452/34 IPG registered at police station Burari on the complaint of Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

(V Smt. Anguri Devi (complainant/respondent no.2 in Crl. M.C. 2645/2018 and accused/petitioner no.l in Crl. M.C.2672/2018)and 2) FIR No. 372/2011 under Sections 308/324/34 IPC registered at police station Burari on the complaint of Sh, Krishan (complainant/respondent no.2 in Crl. M.C. 2672/2018 and accused/petitioner no.2 in Crl. M.C.2645/2018).

It is submitted that petitioners and private respondents are neighbours. A quarrel took place between them on some trivial issue which led to registration of aforesaid FIRs. With the intervention of their common family friends, petitioners and private respondents have settled their disputes amicably vide Settlement Deed dated 5^^ January, 2018.

Complainants/private respondents, namely, Smt. Anguri Devi, Sh. Krishan and Ms. Rajwati are present in Court and have been identified by SI Pankaj Thakral of police station Burari. They submit that they have settled the matter of their own free will and without any undue force pressure or coercion, therefore, they have no objection in case aforesaid FIRs are quashed.

Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and private respondents voluntarily, in my view, no fhiitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the

interest of justice, aforesaid cross-FIRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.

Dasti.

n A.K. PATHAK, J.

MAY 17, 2018 ga