Tarun Bidla v. The State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 9653/2024 & CRL.M.A. 30422/2025 TARUN BIDLA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Vinod Yadav, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..Respondents Through:

Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State Counsel with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 06.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 37054/2024 and CRL.M.A. 30423/2025 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Applications stand disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 9653/2024 & CRL.M.A. 30422/2025 3.

By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR bearing No. 381/2024, registered at Police Station Mehrauli, New Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/341/354/506/ 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC') and subsequent proceedings arising out of the said FIR.

4.

Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. 5.

The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

concerned from Police Station Mehrauli, New Delhi. 6.

Brief facts of the present case are that parties are residing in the same vicinity and are neighbours. On 18.06.2024, quarrel took place between the parties, upon which respondent no. 2 had made a complaint against the petitioner before the concerned Police Station, culminated into the present FIR. It is also stated that a cross-FIR bearing No. 393/2024, for commission of offence punishable under Section 323/341/506 of IPC was also registered at police station Mehrauli, Delhi against the respondent no. 2. 7.

It is stated that during the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have now amicably settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Settlement dated 19.11.2024.

8.

On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO concerned, has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, she has no objection if the FIR is quashed. 9.

In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, and without any coercion, and no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 10.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 381/2024, registered at Police Station Mehrauli, New Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/341/354/506/509 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11.

In view of above, the present petition stands disposed of. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

12.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 06, 2026/ns/ap The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.