Shailender Singh v. Gajender Singh Tomar

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 158/2016 & CM 9974/2016 SHAILENDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through:

None.

versus GAJENDER SINGH TOMAR ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 15.09.2016 None appears on behalf of the appellant. There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant on the last date of hearing, i.e., 28.07.2016 as well. The appellant has failed to comply with the direction of this court as contained in the order dated 18.03.2016. The decretal amount has not been deposited.

The respondent was granted liberty to execute the decree by way of order dated 28.07.2016.

However, since none appears on behalf of the appellant, it seems that he is no longer keen to prosecute the appeal. The appeal is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 mk