Mohd. Ashiq v. State

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 949/2016 MOHD. ASHIQ ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr S.B.Dandapani, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 18.04.2016 Mr Rahul Mehra, learned Standing Counsel (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondent, states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the circumstance that the petitioner has already been released on furlough for three weeks from 05.04.2016. In view of the foregoing, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous at this stage.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J APRIL 18, 2016 mk