Sandhya V N v. Union Of India And ANR.

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17184/2024 SANDHYA V N .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Alim Anvar & Mr. Keerthipriyan, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Arti Bansal, CGSC with Ms.

Shruti, Adv. for UOI.

Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, Adv. for R2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

O R D E R

% 05.12.2025 1.

This petition is filed seeking directions to the respondent to consider the experience of the petitioner on the post of HSST as equivalent to that of PGT. The case set up by the petitioner is that PGT is equivalent to HSST. 2.

The restricted prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner be permitted to represent to respondent no. 2 and to substantiate that the petitioner possesses the necessary experience as required for the post of principal advertised vide annexure P-5. 3.

In view of the restricted prayer made, learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection.

4.

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation along with the documents relied upon within four weeks from today. In the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2025 at 12:06:48

eventuality of the petitioner filing a representation, respondent no. 2 shall consider the same in accordance with law by passing a speaking order within six weeks thereafter.

5.

Needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law, if aggrieved of the decision. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J DECEMBER 5, 2025 'JK'

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2025 at 12:06:48