Amar Singh v. The State

$~4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 679/2018 AMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.S.K. Kashyap, Adv.

versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP.

Insp.Rajesh Shukla ATO Hauz Qazi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 06.07.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the uncle of husband of the deceased. Petitioner along with his wife and family was living on the ground floor; whereas deceased along with her husband and father-in-law were living at the first floor. Petitioner had no reason to interfere in the life of deceased's family on day-to-day basis. It is further submitted that allegations against the petitioner is that they used to taunt the deceased for insufficient dowry.

Petitioner is in custody for about four months. Chargesheet has been filed.

Keeping in mind the totality of facts and circumstances of this case, petitioner is admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

JULY 06, 2018 ab