High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./637/2016

Sachin Kumar @ Raju v. State

2016-10-03Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vipin Sanghi2 pages

$~1.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 637/2016 SACHIN KUMAR @ RAJU ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP with SI Surender Singh

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 03.10.2016 Learned APP points that only four prosecution witnesses remain to be examined. He further submits that the matter is fixed for three dates i.e. 8th to 10th November, 2016 for leading of the prosecution evidence. He assures that the prosecution evidence shall be led on the said dates. No adjournment shall be sought on the said dates. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall cooperate and shall not take any adjournment. In these circumstances, the trial court is directed to complete the trial preferably within the next two months from the next date fixed before the trial court.

In view of the aforesaid direction, the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage. Dismissed.

VIPIN SANGHI, J OCTOBER 03, 2016 sr