Laxmi Kant Tiwari v. State

$~10 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 981/2016 LAXMI KANT TIWARI ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Proxy counsel for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing counsel.

SI Parminder Kumar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 05.05.2016 1.

The instant writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report has been filed. Address of the petitioner has been verified.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 01.03.2016 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 8 & 12 POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo RI for three years with total fine `20,000/-. Crl.A.899/2015 was disposed of by this Court on 19.08.2015. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone seven months and W.P.(CRL) 981/2016

twenty days incarceration besides remission for ten days as on 29.02.2016. It further reveals that he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. He has not availed any interim bail or parole during his detention.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted two weeks parole from the date of release, on furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. 4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J MAY 05, 2016 / tr W.P.(CRL) 981/2016