Anil Kumar Through Pairokar v. Govt Of NCT Of Delhii
$~38 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 4513/2025 ANIL KUMAR THROUGH PAIROKAR .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Atul Bandhu and Ms. Saurabh Aggarwal, Advocates.
versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHII .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for with SI Naveen, PS-Vasant Kunj South.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 23.12.2025 1.
The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No. 271/2025 under Section 310(2)/311/127(2)/140(3)/61(2)/317(2)/331 (6)/351(2)/3(5) BNS & Section 27 ARMS ACT registered at PS Vasant Kunj South, Delhi.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that 11 accused persons armed with deadly weapons committed robbery of Rs.25 Lacs and gold at the house of the complainant. The present petitioner is stated to be the driver of the father of the complainant, who divulged information to the main accused about the father of the complainant going abroad and the status of family members present in the house at the time of incident. 3.
Mr. Atul Bandhu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that as per the prosecution's version, allegation against The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
the petitioner is that of a conspiracy and it is not the case of the prosecution that the petitioner had committed any robbery. 4.
He submits that three co-accused namely Vikas Chaudhary, Shammi and Amit Kumar have already been enlarged on regular bail. He submits that the role assigned to the said three accused persons is also similar to that of the present petitioner inasmuch as the said accused persons were also not directly involved in the robbery and the allegations against them is also that of conspiracy.
5.
He further contends that the marriage of petitioner's daughter is scheduled in February, 2026.
6.
Vide order dated 24.11.2025 a specific direction to the IO was given to verify the factum of the marriage. The status report has been filed by the State, and the same is on record. Perusal of the status report shows that the factum that marriage of petitioner's daughter is scheduled on 14.02.2026, has been verified.
7.
On being queried by the Court, Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned APP for State, on instructions from the IO, fairly states that the role assigned to co-accused who have been enlarged on bail is somewhat similar to the present petitioner inasmuch as they have also been ascribed the role of conspirator like the present petitioner except that the recovery of amount is more from the present petitioner as compared to the other three co-accused. 8.
It is also not in dispute that that the petitioner does not have any previous involvement.
9.
Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 25.06.2025, and in the facts and circumstances of the present case, keeping the petitioner incarcerated to await the outcome of the trial is not warranted, when similarly placed coThe authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
accused have already been enlarged on bail.
10.
Accordingly, the petitioner is admitted to regular bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/JMFC/Duty JM, further subject to the following conditions:
a.
Petitioner shall appear before the Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing.
b.
Petitioner shall provide mobile number to the IO concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times and he shall not change the mobile number without prior intimation to the Investigating Officer concerned.
c.
Petitioner shall not temper with evidence or communicate with or come in contact with witnesses.
11.
It is clarified that the observations made herein above are only for the limited purpose of deciding the present bail application, and the same shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on merits of the case. 12.
The application is disposed of.
13.
Copy of the order be forwarded to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary compliance.
14.
Pending applications stand disposed of.
15.
Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J DECEMBER 23, 2025/jg The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.