Parveen Kumar And ORS. v. State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR

$~101 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 9852/2024 PARVEEN KUMAR AND ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Manjeet Mathur, Mr. Shashwat Rajpurohit, Advs.

versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP with SI Rakesh Kumar, PS Kanjhawala

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 16.12.2024 CRL.M.A. 37761/2024 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 9852/2024 1.

This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 0107/2021 under Sections 452/506/34 of IPC and Section 30 of the Arms Act registered at PS Kanjhawala.

2.

As pe the FIR, the petitioner committed house trespass and criminal intimidation.

3.

During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have arrived at a settlement dated 02.09.2024, wherein respondent No. 2 has agreed to settle and cooperate in quashing of the FIR.

4.

It is stated that the FIR was registered under some misunderstanding The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 08:46:11

over the financial issues and thereafter it has been settled. 5.

Petitioner is present in Court and is identified by Mr. Manjeet Mathur, Adv. Respondent No. 2 is also present and is identified by SI Rakesh Kumar, PS Kanjhawala.

6.

Respondent No. 2 states that she has settled the matter and has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

7.

Parties state that they have arrived at the settlement out of their own free will without any threat, pressure, coercion or undue influence. 8.

I am of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the FIR any further on the ground that the parties have arrived at a voluntary settlement and settled their disputes. 9.

I am convinced that quashing of such proceedings on account of compromise would bring about peace and would secure ends of justice. The Court does not see any fruitful purpose if criminal proceedings as permitted to continue any further. It is a fit case for quashing. In this view of the matter, there is no reason to continue the proceedings. 10.

In view of the aforesaid, FIR No. 0107/2021 under Sections 452/506/34 IPC and Section 30 of the Arms Act registered at PS Kanjhawala and consequential proceedings, if any, arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

JASMEET SINGH, J DECEMBER 16, 2024/DM Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 08:46:11