Jagbandhu Dass @ Tukku v. State

$~33.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 991/2016 JAGBANDHU DASS @ TUKKU ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Sunita Arora, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Ms. Anya Singh and Ms. Megha Bahl, Adv for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 23.03.2017 Crl. M.A. No. 4972/2017 Issue notice. Notice is accepted on behalf of the State. By this application, the petitioner seeks modification of the condition imposed upon by the petitioner vide order dated 10.11.2016 while releasing him on parole requiring him to furnish a personal bond with a local surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is not in a position to provide a local surety and that the petitioner is willing to provide a cash security of Rs.20,000/-.

The nominal roll on record shows that the petitioner has not been released on parole/ furlough earlier. The conduct of the petitioner upon being released is, therefore, not tested.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has earlier been released on furlough on the basis of his cash security. The nominal roll does not reflect that position. Let a fresh nominal roll be called from the Jail Superintendent which should also indicate whether the petitioner has earlier been released on parole/ furlough, and the conditions on which he was earlier released.

List on 18.04.2017. A copy of this order be communicated to the Jail Superintendent.

VIPIN SANGHI, J MARCH 23, 2017 sr