Pushpendra v. State

19# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 986/2016 PUSHPENDRA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Ms. Megha, Advocate for Mr.

Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr. Avi Singh, Additional Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Ananya Mohan, Advocate with Inspector Om Parkash Pawar and SI Om Prakash PS Badarpur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 28.07.2016 By this petition the petitioner seeks parole on the ground of reestablishing ties with the family and admitting his children in the school. As per the status report both the children of the petitioner are studying in BTPS Public School in Ghaziabad. Further the petitioner availed of parole for 15 days from 24th March, 2016 to 4th April, 2016. Thus I find no reason to grant parole to the petitioner.

Petition is dismissed.

Copy of the order be communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent, Tihar Jail.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

JULY 28, 2016/'vn'