Sh Shinde Naresh Lalsaheb @ Naresh Shinde Lalsaheb v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~295 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 17289/2024 SH SHINDE NARESH LALSAHEB @ NARESH SHINDE LALSAHEB .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Vinay Shankar Dubey, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms.

Avshreya Pratap Singh, SPC with Mr. Hussain Taqvi, Ms.

Usha Jamnal and Ms.

Harshita Chaturvedi, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R D E R

% 16.12.2024 CM APPL. 73607/2024 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 17289/2024, CM APPL. 73606/2024 2.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Order dated 23.07.2024 by which the respondents have accepted the petitioner's voluntary retirement along with full pensionary benefits. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has thereafter submitted multiple representations to the respondents for the withdrawal of his request of voluntary retirement, however, the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:28

same have not been considered. He submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the representation is considered by the respondents by passing a speaking order thereon.

4.

Issue notice.

5.

Notice is accepted by Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh, the learned counsel on behalf of the respondents. She submits that the respondents can treat the present petition as a representation of the petitioner and communicate their decision to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today.

6.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the present petition as a representation of the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereon within a period of eight weeks from today.

7.

We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner in the present petition. 8.

In case, the order passed by the respondents is adverse to the interest of the petitioner, it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, J DECEMBER 16, 2024/ss/B/DG Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:28