Vinayak Gupta v. State & An R.

$~30 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 991/2017 VINAYAK GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Javed Ahmad and Ms. Rehana Ahmad, Advs.

versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Neelam Shama, APP for the State along with SI Ajeet Kumar, P.S. C.R.

Park.

Mr. Sachin Aneja and Mr. Prashant Singh, Advs. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 10.03.2017 It is submitted that petitioner and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes amicably vide Settlement Agreement dated 20th February, 2017 (Annexure C), therefore, FIR No. 208/2015 under Sections 354A/509/323 IPC registered at police station C.R. Park on the complaint of respondent no.2, may be quashed.

Respondent no.2 is present in Court and has been identified by SI Ajeet Kumar of police station C.R. Park. Respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioner of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. She further submits that she is not

interested in pursuing the FIR any further in view of the settlement and the same may be quashed.

Keeping in mind that a settlement has been arrived at between the parties, inasmuch as, respondent no.2 is not interested in pursuing the FIR, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 208/2015 under Sections 354A/509/323 IPC registered at police station C.R. Park and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

MARCH 10, 2017 ga