High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/736/2017

Meenu & ANR. v. State & ORS.

2017-03-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vipin Sanghi1 pages

$~39.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 736/2017 & Crl. M.A. No. 4010/2017 MEENU & ANR.

..... Petitioner Through:

Mohd. Yusuf, Adv.

versus STATE & ORS.

..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with SI Arun Kumar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 08.03.2017 Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners are not in contact with him and he has not been able to get in touch with them. Mr. Akhtar has tendered in court a status report, which shows that the petitioners have not been found to be residing at the given address in Delhi. In view of the aforesaid, counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the court again if necessary.

Dismissed as withdrawn liberty as prayed for. VIPIN SANGHI, J MARCH 08, 2017 sr