Satya Priya Mahlawat & ORS. v. The State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3057/2018 & CRL.M.As. 10777/2018 & 6289-90/2019 SATYA PRIYA MAHLAWAT & ORS.

.... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Rishi Pal and Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advs. with the petitioners in person versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.... Respondents Through:

Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with SI Prem Kumar, PS Mehrauli, Delhi Mr. Pardeep Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 24.05.2019 CRL.M.A. 6290/2019 (for taking amended memo of parties on record) In view of the cause submitted in the application, the application is allowed. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C.3057/2018 & CRL.M.As.10777/2018 (for stay) & 6289/2019 (for stay) 1.

Amended memo of parties has been filed and the same is taken on record.

2.

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR

No.767/2000, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC'), registered at P.S.: Mehrauli, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the learned counsel for the parties submitted that the parties have settled their disputes on their own free will, without any force or coercion before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, New Delhi on 23.2.2017, in pursuance whereof, the marriage of the petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 stands dissolved vide decree of divorce dated 23.1.2018.

3.

Respondent No.2, who is present in Court, has reiterated the aforesaid facts and submitted that the petitioners have paid the entire amount to her and now nothing remains due from the petitioners. Respondent No.2 further submitted that she has no objection to the petition being allowed and the FIR being quashed. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of the no objection from the respondent No.2, the present petition may be allowed and the FIR may be quashed.

5.

The Investigating Officer ('IO'), who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 and has also verified the settlement arrived at between the parties. 6.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR

No.767/2000, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Mehrauli, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

7.

Petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J MAY 24, 2019/rk