Mohammad Kaif v. Ultra Home Construction Private Limited

$~CP-1 to 3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CO.PET. 280/2016 MOHAMMAD KAIF ..... Petitioner versus ULTRA HOME CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. ..... Respondent + CO.PET. 1178/2016 CHITRA GROVER ..... Petitioner versus ULTRA HOME CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. ..... Respondent + CO.PET. 1223/2016 KRIMSON KRAFT LIFESTYLE ..... Petitioner versus ULTRA HOME CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. .....Respondent

Present:

Ms.Swaralipi Deb Roy, Adv. for the petitioner.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

O R D E R

% 28.09.2018 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the respondent company forms part of the Amrapali Group and the Supreme Court is seized with the issue regarding the entire Amrapali Group. She also submits that the proceedings are pending before the NCLT. She submits that these matters be also transferred to NCLT.

In my opinion, it would be appropriate that these company petitions be transferred to the NCLT where other such matters are also listed. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the NCLT is also awaiting the outcome of the proceedings pending before the Supreme Court. In view of the above, the present petitions are transferred to NCLT under section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Registry will take appropriate steps. JAYANT NATH, J.

SEPTEMBER 28, 2018/v