Ramesh Chandra v. Delhi Jal Board & ANR.

$~15 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 17987/2025 RAMESH CHANDRA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv.

versus DELHI JAL BOARD & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Mr.

Sachin Garg, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Vishruti Pandey, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 09.01.2026 1.

Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that if the Petitioner was undergoing 'currency period' of penalty and adverse record, then Seal Cover Procedure should have been adopted. 2.

At being posed a pointed question, learned counsel representing the Petitioner admits that this issue was never pressed before the Central Administrative Tribunal. A perusal of the Impugned Order dated 22.08.2025 also shows that this submission was never made before Central Administrative Tribunal.

3.

Accordingly, the present Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to file an appropriate application seeking review/reconsideration of his matter before Central Administrative Tribunal, if permissible in law.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

JANUARY 09, 2026 jai/kb The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/01/2026 at 13:18:26