Vijay Kumar Diwakar v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~14 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 2086/2015 & CM Nos. 7227/2016, 8942/2016 VIJAY KUMAR DIWAKAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr Joginder Tuli, Mr Ashu Kumar and Mr Ayush Gupta, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr Satyakam, ASC with Inspector Rajesh, SI Pankaj for GNCTD Ms Rashmi Malhotra and Ms Priyanka Bharihoke, Advocate for SDMC Mr Ajay Verma, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Sanjiv Sabharwal and Mr Vaibhav Mishra, Advocates for DDA Mr Aly Mirza and Mr Jeetender Chaudhary, Advocates for applicants in CM No. 7226-27/2016

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 16.03.2016 The South Delhi Municipal Corporation has taken action. The status report handed over by the learned counsel for the SDMC is taken on record. No further directions are necessary in this writ petition. The applicants in CM Nos. 7226/2016 & 7227/2016 may take recourse and remedies that may be available to them in law. The applicants in the said applications shall be free to take all pleas that are available to them in law and on facts.

From the status report which has been taken on record, it appears that the South Delhi Municipal Corporation has written to the Station

House Officer, Police Station Pul Prahlad Pur, New Delhi for taking action against Shri Sohan Lal, Shri Ashok, Shri Manoj and Shri Mahinder, who were alleged owners of the property in question and who had apparently sold this property to the applicants in the said application, despite there being a sealing order and the properties having been sealed. The SHO shall proceed in accordance with law. The writ petition stands disposed of.

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MARCH 16, 2016 rs