Mohd. Shahnawaz v. State NCT Of Delhi

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 899/2016 MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Suneel Upadhya, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr.

Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 21.03.2016 Mr. Jamal Akhtar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Rahul Mehra, learned Standing Counsel (Criminal) states that in view of the exigency expressed in the representation for parole, filed on behalf of the petitioner, in order to enable the latter to remain present at the purported coronary surgery of his aged father, they shall dispose of the said representation, which is pending before the competent authority, within a period of three working days from today, under intimation to the petitioner.

Directed accordingly.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MARCH 21, 2016 dn