← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/3932/2025

Sameer v. State Gnct Of Delhi

2025-12-10Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna3 pages

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3932/2025 SAMEER .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Chetan Bhardwaj and Ms. Priyal Bhardwaj, Advs.

versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 10.12.2025 1.

Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking quashing of Order No.18/22/2025/HG/ PRISONS/3501 dated 14.11.2025, vide which the Parole Application of the Petitioner has been rejected and release the Petitioner on Parole for a period of four weeks.

2.

It is submitted that the Parole has been denied in terms of Rule 1210 (II) of Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, which provides that Petitioner should have uniformly good conduct for last two years from the date of Application. Petitioner was awarded punishment on 03.02.2025 and 1.02.2025 and hence, Parole was denied.

3.

It is submitted that despite punishment, Petitioner has also been granted Parole by this Court vide Order dated 09.04.2025 in W.P.(CRL.) 1108/2025. Since, February, 2025, there has been no unsatisfactory conduct The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

of the Petitioner and no punishment has been awarded to him. Prayer is therefore, made that he be granted Parole for four weeks. 4.

Learned ASC takes objection on the ground of conduct of the Petitioner, who has been awarded punishment twice in February, 2025. Submissions heard and record perused.

5.

Even though the Petitioner had been awarded punishment twice in the month of February, 2025. The Petitioner has also undergone custody of more than 14 years 07 months and 10 days and has earned Remission of 09 months and 12 days, but has been granted Parole twice by this Court, since then.

6.

Considering the objective of Parole and long incarceration of the Petitioner, he is granted parole for a period of four weeks in FIR No.0072/2011 under Sections 302/120B/392/411/34 IPC, registered at P.S.: Vivek Vihar, Delhi, upon his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- and one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent and subject to the following conditions:- a) Petitioner shall appear before the Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing;

b) Petitioner shall provide his mobile number to IO/SHO concerned, which shall be kept in working condition at all times; c) Petitioner shall inform the IO/SHO and the Jail Superintendent, about the address where he shall be available in Delhi; d) Petitioner shall ordinarily reside at the address mentioned in the Petition;

e) Immediately upon the expiry of period of Parole, the Petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

7.

A copy of this Order be communicated to the learned Trial Court and the concerned Jail Superintendent.

8.

Writ Petition along with pending Applications is disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

DECEMBER 10, 2025/R The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.