Ravi @ Bhonda v. State

$~15 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 970/2016 RAVI @ BHONDA ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr.Siddharth Sindhu, Advocate.

SI Om Parkash.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 28.03.2016 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of two months. Status report is on record. Address of the petitioner has been verified. 2.

Nominal Roll dated 08.03.2016 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 376(2)(g)/392/394/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with total fine `35,000/-. Crl.A.885/2012 was disposed of by this Court on 18.11.2015. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone six years, six months and twenty-four days incarceration besides remission for eleven months and twenty-eight days as on 03.03.2016. It further reveals that W.P.(CRL) 970/2016

he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. He has not availed any interim bail or parole during his detention.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of release, on furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. 4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J MARCH 28, 2016 / tr W.P.(CRL) 970/2016