Pradeep v. State

$~15.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 792/2017 PRADEEP ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. M Shamikh, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel along with Inspector Khalid Akhtar, PS - Prasad Nagar, for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 22.03.2017 Status report has been filed. The factum of the petitioner having been put on ventilator has been got verified.

In view of the aforesaid, the furlough granted to the petitioner is extended by a further period of two months on the same terms and conditions on which he was initially granted furlough. However, the petitioner shall not be required to provide his personal bond. This order be communicated to the Jail Superintendent. Order dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. VIPIN SANGHI, J MARCH 22, 2017 B.S. Rohella