Harsh Aggarwal v. State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

$~85 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ HARSH AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Manoj, Mr. Balram Sharma and Mr. Banshi Pandit, Advocates.

Petitioner in-person.

versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Chavi Lazarus with Mr. Kshitiz Garg and Mr.

Ashvini Kumar, Advocates for Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State.

SI Ajay and HC Devender, P.S.:

North Rohini.

Mr.

Sanjay and Ganesh Pandit, Advocate for R-2.

R-2 in-person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 20.12.2024 CRL.M.A. 38614/2024 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.

By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No.80124194/2024 dated 27.10.2024 registered under section The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 ('BNS') at P.S.: North Rohini/e-Police Station, Delhi.

2.

The petition is premised on Compromise/Settlement Deed/MOU dated 13.12.2024, whereby the petitioner and respondent No.2 have resolved the matter amicably.

3.

The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioner and of respondent No.2, alongwith proof of their IDs. 4.

The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel.

5.

The court has interacted with the respondent No.2, as also with petitioner, who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter and a Compromise/Settlement Deed/MOU dated 13.12.2024 has been signed by them closing all issues amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward.

6.

Learned counsel appearing for Mr. Amol Sinha, learned ASC confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.

7.

In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. 8.

Accordingly case FIR No.80124194/2024 dated 27.10.2024 registered under section 305 of the BNS at P.S.: North Rohini/e-Police Station, Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed. 9.

Petition stands disposed-of.

10.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J DECEMBER 20, 2024/ak The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.