Mayank v. State N.C.T Of Delhi

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 779/2018 & CRL.M.A. 6388/2018 MAYANK ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Raghwendra Tiwari, Adv.

versus STATE N.C.T OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State with SI Manish Choudhary, PS Shahdara.

Mr. SP Sharma, proxy for R-2 & 3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA

O R D E R

% 31.05.2018 Status report is on the record.

On behalf of the applicant it has been submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case and that apart from the disclosure statement of the co-accused, there is nothing incriminating found against the applicant during the course of proceedings, which is refuted on behalf of the State and it has been submitted on behalf of the State through the status report that during the investigation the applicant was arrested and was sent to Dasna Jail, as a consequence of which, the production warrant was issued on 24.06.2017 and that he was arrested after seeking permission from the Court whereafter on 06.07.2017 his identification has been conducted in Tihar Jail and the son of the complainant who was driving the vehicle at the time of the alleged commission of the offence by the

accused has categorically identified the applicant, which is so also indicated through the TIP proceedings dated 06.07.2017 conducted by the Tihar Jail.

In the circumstance, thus there is no ground for grant of bail. The application is dismissed.

Nothing stated hereinabove would amount to an expression of the merits of the case.

ANU MALHOTRA, J MAY 31, 2018 vm