High Court of DelhiCRL.REV.P./435/2018

Deepak Kumar Chakraborty v. P.P.Khurana

2019-07-25Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sunil Gaur1 pages

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 435/2018 DEEPAK KUMAR CHAKRABORTY ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. S.K. Bhattacharya, Ms. Seema Sharma, Ms. Preity & Ms. Shanya, Advocates

Versus

P.P. KHURANA & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Sachin Sood & Ms. Priya Soni, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 25.07.2019 In proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, trial court vide impugned order has directed petitioner to pay fine of ₹7,00,000/-, out of which ₹6,90,000/- is to be paid as compensation to respondent-complainant and ₹10,000/- to be deposited as fine. In case of default of payment of fine and compensation, petitioner has been directed to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Nominal roll of petitioner has been requisitioned and its perusal reveals that petitioner has already undergone sentence in default. Petitioner's counsel submits that this petition has become infructuous.

This petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE JULY 25, 2019 r