Deepak And ORS v. State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 10125/2024 & CRL. MA 38849/2024 DEEPAK AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Lokesh Khanna, Advocate with petitioners in person.

versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP fro State with SI Gajender PS Aman Vihar, Delhi.

Respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 24.12.2024 1.

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 400/2012 registered under Sections 498-A/406/506/34 IPC at P.S. Aman Vihar, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and petitioner No. 1 (husband) and petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 are in-laws of the complainant. 3.

Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.

is the complainant/victim.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 22.02.2018. In terms of the settlement, the parties have already The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

been granted divorce by mutual consent vide divorce decree dated 10.04.2019 passed by the Family Court, Rohini, Delhi in HMA No. 838/2019. It is stated that all payments have been made by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No. 2 towards her claims qua maintenance, stridhan, alimony, etc.

5.

Petitioners, who are present in Court, have been identified by their counsel as well as by the I.O./ SI Gajender PS Aman Vihar, Delhi. 6.

Respondent No. 2 who is also present in Court alongwith her mother and identified by the I.O., states that she has settled her disputes with petitioner No.1 out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She also acknowledges the receipt of entire settled amount and submits that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed against the petitioners. The gate pass issued to the respondent no.2 has been handed over and is taken on record.

7.

Learned counsel for the parties submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

10.

In view of the above terms, the petition is disposed of alongwith miscellaneous application.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

DECEMBER 24, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.