Rajpal Singh v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8697/2025 RAJPAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rohit Kalra, Advocate.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State.

Mr. Sachin Verma, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 (through Video Conferencing)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 05.12.2025 CRL.M.A. 36298/2025 (Exemption) 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 8697/2025 3.

Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as 'B.N.S.S.'), has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Rajpal Singh for quashing of FIR No. 167/2023 dated 06.06.2023 under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') registered at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, in terms of the Settlement dated 06.08.2024.

4.

Issue Notice.

5.

On advance Notice, learned APP has appeared and accepted the Notice on behalf of the State.

6.

It is submitted that the Petitioner was an employee of the Respondent The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 11:26:39

No. 2/Complainant for 32 years and his service was terminated as he took away some papers from the Office about which, the Complainant came to know when there was litigation pending another Department initiated by the Petitioner.

7.

On the Complaint of the Respondent No.2/Complainant, FIR No.167/2023 dated 06.06.2023 under Section 381 of IPC, got registered at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi.

8.

It is stated that the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 2 have amicably settled all the disputes and differences between them and arrived at Settlement vide Memorandum of Settlement (MOU) dated 06.08.2024. A sum of Rs.2,50,000/- has also been paid by the Respondent No. 2 to the Petitioner, towards the full and final Settlement of all his claims. 9.

Today, the Respondent No. 2, who is present through VideoConferencing, states that has no objection if the FIR is quashed. 10.

The parties are present before this Court in-person today, and have been identified by their Counsel and Investigating Officer concerned and they have entered into the Settlement voluntarily and without any fear and coercion and undertake to remain bound by the terms of the said Settlement. 11.

Considering the nature of the allegations and that they have settled the matter, the FIR No. 167/2023 dated 06.06.2023 under Section 381 of IPC, registered at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

12.

The Petition is disposed of accordingly.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J DECEMBER 5, 2025/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 11:26:39