Ajanta Offset & Packagings Limited v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~19 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2734/2016 & CM No. 11508/2016 AJANTA OFFSET & PACKAGINGS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. M.P. Devnath, Advocate along with Mr. Abhishek Anand and Mr.

Yogendra Aldak, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 and R-4.

Mr. Sameer Jain, Standing counsel for customs.

And + W.P.(C) 2738/2016 & CM No. 11519/2016 AJANTA OFFSET & PACKAGINGS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. M.P. Devnath, Advocate along with Mr. Abhishek Anand and Mr.

Yogendra Aldak, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 and R-4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 09.09.2016 The petitioner's submit, at the outset, that all letters communicating that the discharge of export obligation by them, in

terms of the licenses stipulations was fulfilled. The said discharge letters are taken on record. As a consequence following the reasons in Lifelong India Pvt. Ltd vs. Union of India [W.P.C. No. 10031/2015 decided on 12.01.2016 reported in 2016 (334) ELT 410 (Delhi)], the matter is remitted to the concerned original authority for passing consequential orders.

The impugned orders and the consequential recovery letters are therefore set aside. The writ petitions are allowed in the above terms. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J DEEPA SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 09, 2016 sapna