← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1691/2018

Bhupesh Kumar & ANR v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS

2018-04-06Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva3 pages

$-65 & 72 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CRL.M.C. 1667/2018 + BHAGWAN DASS & ORS Petitioners Ms. Divya Attri, Adv.

Through:

versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through:

Mr. Arun Kr. Sharma, APP SI Gajendra Singh, P.S. Ranjit Nagar Mr. B.K. Jha and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs. for R-2 Respondents # CRL.M.C. 1691/2018 + BHUPESH KUMAR & ANR ....Petitioners Through:

Mr. B.K. Jha and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs.- versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through:

Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP SI Gajendra Singh, P.S. Ranjit Nagar Ms. Divya Attri, Adv. for R-2 & R-3 Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

ORDER

06.04.2018 % CrI. M.A. 6092/2018(exemptionl Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

CRL,M.C.1667/2018 & 1691/2018

CRL.M.C. 1667/2018 & CRL.M.C. 1691/2018, Cri>M.A.6091/2018 (Stay) Petitioners in Crl.M.C. 1667/2018 seek quashing of FIR No. 1.

14/2015 under Sections 323/341/325/34 IPC PS Ranjit Nagar. Petitioners in Crl.M.C. 1691/2018 seek quashing of FIR 13/2015 under Sections 308/34 IPC PS Ranjit Nagar. Subject FIRs are cross FIRs.

The parties are present in person. Subject incident occurred on 2.

account of fixing of an electricity pole by the Electricity Department which led . to an altercation between the parties; consequent complaints were lodged which led to the registration of cross FIRs. With the intervention of senior members of the locality and respectable people, Deed of Compromise dated 19.02.2016 has been entered into.

3.

Respective parties are present in. Court, represented by counsel and identified by the Investigating Officer. They confirm that they «'

have settled their disputes with each other to restore peace and harmony in the locality. They have further undertaken to live peacefully and not to initiate any legal proceedings against each other. 4.

In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would also be expedient to CRL.M.C.1667/2018;& 1691/2018

. ^ quash the subject FIRs in both the cases and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

5.

In view of the above, the petitions are allowed. FIR 14 of 2015 under Sections 323/341/325/34 IPC PS Ranjit Nagar, Delhi and FIR 13 of 2015 under Sections 308/34 IPC PS Ranjit Nagar, Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, subject to the petitioners in each of the cases depositing cost of Rs.7,500/- with i the ''Prisoners Welfare Fund, Jail No. 13, Mandoli'\ Mangal Pandey Marg, Harsh Vihar, Village Mandoli, Delhi within two weeks. The receipt of deposit of the costs imposed by this Order be furnished to the concerned Investigating Officer within a period of three weeks from today.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. 6.

SANJEEY SACHDEVA, J APRIL 06,2018 ns CRL.M.C.1667/2018 & 1691/2018