Ravi Kumar v. State Govt. Of NCT Of Dlehi And ORS.
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 10222/2024 and CRL.M.A. 39173/2024 RAVI KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms.Ria Goyal and Mr.Rishabh Singla, Advocates with petitioner in person versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DLEHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for State with SI Shanu Ms.Vaishali Singh and Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 and 3 with respondent Nos.2 and 3 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI % 24.12.2024
O R D E R
1.
The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.1078/2015 registered under Section 308 IPC at P.S. Kalyan Puri, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.
As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioner abused and gave beatings to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and hit respondent No.2 with a kitchen knife.
3.
Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case, the petitioner is the only accused and respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the complainants/victims and that the chargesheet already stands filed. He further submits that the petitioner is the maternal uncle of respondent No.2/complainant and the injuries are caused by a kitchen knife on the head The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
of respondent No.2, however, the same have been opined to be simple in nature. He also submits that considering the serious nature of averments/allegations and since the State machinery has already been put in motion, the petitioner be saddled with some costs. 4.
Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement vide Compromise Deed dated 09.12.2024 and in terms of the settlement, respondent Nos.2 and 3 are now left with no claims or grievances whatsoever against the petitioner. 5.
The petitioner and respondent Nos.2 and 3, who are present in Court, have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the concerned Investigating Officer.
6.
The petitioner has shown remorse for his conduct and he undertakes not to repeat the same in future. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 state that they have entered into the aforesaid Compromise Deed out of their own free will, volition and without any coercion. They further state that they have no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed. 7.
Learned counsels for the parties submit that there are other connected FIRs being FIR No.1079/2015 registered under Section 308/34 IPC at P.S. Kalyan Puri, Delhi and FIR No.0472/2016 registered under Sections 354D/506/509/34 IPC at P.S. Kalyan Puri, Delhi pending between the parties, which have been quashed vide orders dated 24.12.2024 in CRL.M.C. 10229/2024 and CRL.M.C. 10242/2024, respectively. 8.
The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.
9.
In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- by the petitioner to be deposited with 'Avlamban Fund Scheme 2024' a scheme formulated by GNCT of Delhi for survivor of acid attacks (Account No. 43599660056 at State Bank of India, Tis Hazari Branch, Delhi; IFSC SBIN0000726 & MICR Code 110002126) within a period of four weeks from today. 10.
Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. In case the receipt of payment of cost is not filed within the stipulated time, the I.O. shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application. 11.
With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J DECEMBER 24, 2024 na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.