Mohd Mobin And Others v. The State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 10231/2024 MOHD MOBIN AND OTHERS .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Prem Prakash, Mr. Abhishek Ranjan, Ms. Sukanya, Adv.

versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ...Respondent Through:

Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP SI Rajesh Kumar, PS Vijay Vihar Mr. Babar Ali for complainant

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 24.12.2024 CRL.M.A. 39204/2024 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 10231/2024 1.

This is a petition seeking quashing of F.I.R. No. 137/2024 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

It is stated that the parties have arrived at a settlement dated 23.07.2024 before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi, pursuant to which the petitioner had to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000/- to respondent No.2, out of which Rs. 25,000/- has already been paid and the balance sum of Rs. 25,000/- has been paid today in Court by way of Cash. 3.

There are two children born out of the wedlock, who are in the care and custody of the petitioner.

4.

In view of the judgment of 'Ganesh vs. Sudhir Kumar Srivastava' The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:33:09

[(2020) 20 SCC 787], the settlement is executed between the petitioners and respondent No. 2, and this order shall have no effect on the rights of child of the parties, who shall be free to avail all legal rights and remedies towards inheritance, maintenance, education, marriage expenses etc. against either of their parents.

5.

Petitioners are present in Court and have been identified by their counsel, Mr. Abhishek Ranjan.

6.

Respondent No. 2 is also present in Court and has been identified by her counsel, Mr. Babar Ali.

7.

Both parties state that they have entered into the aforesaid settlement out of their own free will, volition and without any threat, force, undue influence or coercion. It is stated by respondent No.2 that she has no objection if the F.I.R. is quashed.

8.

Since the parties have arrived at a settlement and no disputes are pending, I am convinced that quashing of such proceedings on account of compromise would bring about peace and would secure ends of justice. The Court does not see any fruitful purpose if criminal proceedings are permitted to be prosecuted any further. It is a fit case for quashing. 9.

In this view of the matter, F.I.R. No. 137/2024 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 10.

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

JASMEET SINGH, J DECEMBER 24, 2024/sp The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:33:09