Union Of India v. Radha Rawat & ANR
// $-72 to 96 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LA.APP. 42/2015 RADHA RAW AT & ANR Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Adv. for Mr. S.K.
Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for DBA.
LA.APP. 50/2015 PRADEEP KUMAR & ANR Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Adv. for Mr. S.K.
Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for DBA.
LA.APP. 55/2015 SHASHIBALA & ANR Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for DBA.
LA.APP. 61/2015 & CM Nos. 1479/2015 (for stay), 1480/2015 & 1481/2015 (both for condonation of delay of 100 days in filing & 156 days in re-filing the appeal) BIDHI SEN GUPTA & ANR Page J of 9 By:AMULYA
// LA.APP. 65/2015 & CM No.l659/2015 (for stay) BAD WAN SINGH & ANR LA.APP. 81/2015 & CMNo.2013/2015 (for stay) ..... Appellant HEMANT & ANR Ms. Kanika Goel, Adv. for R-1.
LA.APP. 95/2015 & CM No.3543/2015 (for stay) BRIJ BALA & ANR LA.APP. 96/2015 & CM No.3547/2015 (for stay) RAM NIWAS & ANR Respondent Ms. Kanika Goel, Adv. for R-1.
LA.APP. 97/2015, CMNo.3551/2015 (for stay) KULDEEP RANA & ANOTHER LA.APP. 98/2015 & CMNo.3560/2015 (for stay) HARISH KUMAR & ANR LA.APP. 100/2015 8l CMNo.3578/2015 (for stay) RANBIR SINGH & ANR Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Adv. for Mr. S.K.
Yadav, Adv.
LA.APP. 102/2015 & CMNo.3593/2015 (for stay) TRINETRA NATH &ANR
LA.APP. 103/2015 & CM,No.3603/2015 (for stay) JAI PAL & ANR Ms. Kanika Goel, Adv. for R-1.
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for DBA.
LA.APP. 104/2015 & CMNo.3613/2015 (for stay) NARENDER SINGH & ANR Ms. Kanika Goel, Adv. for R-1.
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for DBA.
Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi & Mr. Shashank Khurana, Advs. for DBA.
, LA.APP. 105/2015 & CM No.3623/2015 (for stay) UNION-OF INDIA V ersus INDER DEV & ANR Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for DBA.
Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi & Mr. Shashank Khurana, Advs. for DBA.
LA.APP. 108/2015 KRISHNA & ANR Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for DBA.
LA.APP. 109/2015 & CMNo.3641/2015 (for stay) RAHDESHYAM & ORS Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Adv. for Mr. S.K.
Yadav, Adv.
LA.APP. 110/2015 & CMNo.3650/2015 (for stay) KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR Ms. Kaiiika Goel, Adv. for R-1.
LA.APP. 112/2015 & CMNo.3658/2015 (for stay) PRADLLP RANA & ANR ^ Through: Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for DDA.
LA.APP. 113/2015 & CMNo.3666/2015 (for stay) SURLSH & ANR Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Adv. for Mr. S.K.
Yadav, Adv.
^2, LA.APP. 237/2015 Mr. Yeeshu Jain & Ms, Jyoti Tyagi, SHEELA DEVI & ANR Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv. for DDA.
LA.APP. 263/2015, CM Nos.9665/2015 (for stay) & 9666/2015 (for condonation of delay of 436 days in filing the appeal) UNION OF E4DIA JAI SINGH & ANR TFhrough: Ms. Kanika Goel, Adv. for R-1.
LA.APP. 277/2015, CM Nos.9723/2015 (for stay) & 9724/2015 (for condonation of delay of 434 days in filing the appeal) NARENDER SINGH & ANR LA.APP. 303/2015 j'
DALEUSINGH&ORS Mr. Ajinkya Tiwari & Mr. Kartik Jindal, Advs. for DDA.
Page 6 nf 9
• LA.APP. 319/2015 Versus .
MANOJ KUMAR & ANR Mr. Ajinkya Tiwari & Mr. Kartik Jindal, Advs. for DDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW
ORDER
% - 05.09.2018 1.
These appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 impugn the compensation awarded to the respondents / land owners by the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Act.
2.
The appeals were admitted for hearing and ordered to be listed in the category of "Regulars".
3.
The counsel for the appellant Union of India (UOI) on request of this Court to furnish particulars of 'covered' matters pending consideration, furnished the particulars and the Registry was directed to list the said matters in the cause list in the category of 'After Notice Miscellaneous Matters'. The-Court Master was also directed to telephonically inform the Advocates for the private parties of the matters so ordered to be listed. 4.
The appeals are listed today in terms of above. 5.
Only the counsels for the private parties / land owners in LA. APP. Nos.42/2015, 50/2015, 81/2015, 96/2015, 100/2015, 103/2015, 104/2015, 109/2015, 110/2015,113/2015 & 263/2015 appear.
AS'
6.
None appears for the private parties / land owners in LA.APP. Nos.55/2015,-61/2015, 65/2015, 95/2015, 97/2015, 98/2015, 102/2015, 105/2015, 108/2015, 112/2015, 237/2015, 277/2015, 303/2015 & 319/2015 but in view of what is mentioned below, need to await the private parties / land owners is not felt.
7.
The counsel for appellant UOI has been heard separately in each of the appeals but for the sake of convenience, this common order is being passed.
8.
The counsel for appellant UOI states that these matters pertain to land acquired in village Shahbad Daulatpur, compensation with respect to which was determined vide Award No.29/2002-03. It is further stated that the compensation with respect to other land acquired vide the same notification and award has been determined by this Court in Hem Chander Malik Vs. Union of India 2011 SCO OnLine Del 41 ij and SLP(C) No.26985/2012 titled Hem Chander Malik Vs. Union of India preferred thereagainst was dismissed by the Supreme Court on 30'*^ October, 2015. He thus states that the compensation with respect to the land subject matter of these appeals has to be determined in accordance with the dicta of this Court in Hem Chander Malik supra. It is further informed that this Court in Hem Chander Malik affirmed the compensation awarded by the Reference Court. 9.
Resultantly, the appeals are dismissed.
No costs.
10.
Decree sheets be drawn up.
Trial court record, if requisitioned, be returned. 11.
The date already given of October, 2018 in LA.APT.
Nos.61/2015, 263/2015 & 277/2015 is cancelled.
j RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J SEPTEMBER 05, 2018 'gsr'