Gopi Nath Sharma v. Kalpana Sharma & ORS
$~36 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.REV.P. 200/2017 GOPI NATH SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.S.C. Malhotra, Adv.
versus KALPANA SHARMA & ORS ..... Respondents Through
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R
% 21.03.2017 Crl. M.A. 4764/2017 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the petition is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
Crl. M.A. 4765/2017 Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.
Crl. Rev. P. 200/2017 Heard.
In the present petition, the petitioner is the husband and the respondent No.1 is the wife and out of the said wedlock two children (respondent Nos.2 & 3) were also born. The respondent No.1 does not reside with her husband i.e. petitioner. Further, the respondent Nos.2 & 3, who are minors, are residing with respondent No.1 i.e. their mother/natural guardian. On bare perusal, I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order and
the same requires no interference by this Court. The petition is accordingly dismissed.
I.S.MEHTA, J MARCH 21, 2017/km