Nemi Chand Jain @ Chandra Swami v. Enfrocement Directorate

$-26 to 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1164/2017 NEMI CHAND JAIN @ CHANDRA SWAMI Petitioner Through Mr. Anurag, Advocate versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC + CRL.M.C. 1165/2017 NEMI CHAND JAIN @ CHANDRA SWAMI .....Petitioner Through Mr. Anurag, Advocate versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE .....Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC + CRL.M.C. 1166/2017 NEMI CHAND JAIN @ CHANDRA SWAMI .....Petitioner Through Mr. Anurag, Advocate versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE .....Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate + CRL.M.C. 1167/2017 NEMI CHAND JAIN @ CHANDRA SWAMI .....Petitioner Through Mr. Anurag, Advocate By:AMULYA

versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate ± CRL.M.C. 1168/2017 NEMI CHAND JAIN @ CHANDRA SWAMI Petitioner Through Mr. Anurag, Advocate versus ENFROCEMENT DIRECTORATE Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate + CRL.M.C. 1169/2017 NEMI CHAND JAIN @ CHANDRA SWAMI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Anurag, Advocate versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

% 25.07.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by these petitions, petitioner had challenged the condition of deposit of Z10 lacs imposed by the Trial Court while granting permission to the petitioner to travel abroad. However, the petitioner has died,

therefore, the petitions have become infructuous. In view of the above, abovenoted petitions are disposed of as infructuous.

A.KTK, J JULY 259 2017 mw