Anurag Gupta v. The State
$~5 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 720/2018 ANURAG GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajat Arora with Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advs. with petitioner in person versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State.
SI Naveen, PS Punjabi Bagh Mr. Sameer Dewan, Adv. for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
O R D E R
% 16.10.2019 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in pursuance to FIR No.521/2017 dated 26.09.2017 registered at police station Punjabi Bagh instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC.
It is stated by both the sides that matter has been settled between the parties and first motion agreement has been executed and second motion is to be filed.
Counsel for the respondent/complainant submits that respondent has no objection to the grant of bail. However, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall file second motion of divorce within one month from today. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered view that the present case is fit for anticipatory bail. The
SHO/ Arresting Officer/IO concerned, is hereby directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner/ applicant be released on bail on the following terms and conditions:- (i) That the petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of ₹20,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer/SHO/IO concerned;
(ii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation by police officer, as and when required; In case of default of aforementioned conditions, the State is at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. Before parting with the order, it is relevant to mention that nothing contained in this order shall be construed as an expression on the merits of the case.
Application stands allowed and disposed of.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J OCTOBER 16, 2019 ms