Md. Quazi Jamil Ahamad v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4022/2018 MD. QUAZI JAMIL AHAMAD ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Jha, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 29.05.2018 CM No.23105/2018 (exemption) Subject to the petitioner filing the certified/typed/legible copies of the documents annexed with the petition within four weeks, the application is allowed and disposed of.

CM No.23104/2018 (by the petitioner for modification of the order dated 24.04.2018) 1.

At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents states that the present application has been rendered infructuous, in as much as, the petitioner's representation stands decided. He states that the decision taken has been sent to the concerned Unit for being communicated to the petitioner.

2.

In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the present application is dismissed, as infructuous. HIMA KOHLI, J.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MAY 29, 2018/'hkaur'