Naresh & ANR v. State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi)& ORS

$-'38/62 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CRL.M.C. 1228/2018 + SURESH KUMAR Petitioner Through Mr. M.P. Sinha and Mr. Yatharth Sinha, Advs.

versus ■< STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS Through Respondents Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Devi Lai, P.S. Maurya Enclave Private respondents in person AND GRLM.C. 1689/2018 + NARESH & ANR Petitioners Through Mr. Mayank Gupta, Adv.

versus . n STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS Through Respondents Dr. M.P. Singh, APP with SI Devi Lai, P.S. Maurya Enclave Private respondents in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

% 06.04.2018 By these petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it has been prayed that following cross FIRs may be quashed.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

(a) FIR No. 559/2017 under Sections 307/34 IPC registered at P S. Maurya Enclave. Mr. Naresh Kumar @ Deni and Mr. Desh Raj @ Deshu are respondent ns. 2 and 3 in Crl. M.C. No. 1228/2018 and they are petitioners in Crl. M.C. No. 1689/2018. They are injured in.the aforesaid FIR.

(b) FIR No. 560/2017 under Sections 341/307/34 IPC ^registered at P.S.

Maurya Enclave on the complaint of respondent no. 3 Mr. Suraj @ Golu in Crl. M.C. No. 1689/2018. Mr. Suresh Kumar and Mr. Suraj @ Golu are injured in the aforesaid FIR and accused/petitioner nos. 1 and 2 in Crl. M.C. 1228/2018.

It IS submitted that Mr. Suresh Kumar, Mr. Suraj @ Golu, Mr. Arjun Kumar, Mr. Naresh Kumar @ Deni and Mr. Desh Raj @ Deshu are % on some trivial issues.

neighbours. A quarrel took place between them wherein both the parties sustained injuries.

Learned APP submits that Naresh Kumar @ Deny had sustained grievous injuries; therefore, both the aforesaid FIRs may not be quashed. Mr.

Suresh Kumar, Mr. Suraj @ Golu, Mr. Naresh Kumar @ Deni and Mr. Desh Raj @ Deshu (injured persons) are present in Court and have been identified by SI Devi Lai of police station Maurya Enclave. They

submit that they have settled their disputes amicably and are not willing to pursue their respective FIRs.

Keeping in mind the fact that a quarrel ensued between the neighbours on some trivial matter ^d they have settled the matter voluntarily, in my view, no fixiitful purpose would be served to keep the criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the interest of justice both the FIRs, that is, FIR No. 559/2017 under Sections 307/34 IPC and FIR No. 560/2017 under Sections 341/307/34 IPC, both registered at P.S. Maurya Enclave and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. '■•v r A.K. PATHAK, J.

APRIL 06, 2018 r. hararia