Jagdeep Singh Ahluwalia v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8946/2025, CRL.M.A. 37362/2025 (stay) JAGDEEP SINGH AHLUWALIA .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Shubham Seth, Advocate with Petitioner.
versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State with SI Vikrant Singh, PS Hari Nagar.
Mr. Arunim Dinkar, Advocate for R2 with R2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 15.12.2025 CRL.M.A. 37363/2025 (Exemption) 1.
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.
The Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 8946/2025 3.
Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as 'B.N.S.S.‟ has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Jagdip Singh Ahluwalia, for quashing of FIR No. 254/2022, under Section 354(B)/509/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC‟) registered at Police Station Hari Nagar and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefromm, in terms of the Settlement dated 29.09.2025.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
4.
Issue Notice.
5.
On advance Notice, learned APP has appeared and accepted the Notice on behalf of the State.
6.
It is submitted that the Petitioner is the brother-in-law of the Complainant, who had some disputes over the property in which, they both are residing.
7.
On the Complaint of the Respondent No.2/Complainant, FIR No.254/2022, under Section 354(B)/509/506 of IPC, got registered at Police Station Hari Nagar.
8.
It is stated that the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 2 have amicably settled all the disputes and differences between them and arrived at Settlement vide Memorandum of Settlement (MOU) dated 29.09.2025. In the Settlement, it was inter alia settled between the parties that the roof right (Ownership) of the third floor lies with the Complainant. It is also settled between the parties that the Petitioner shall not create any trouble in future. It is also settled between the parties that they shall live peacefully in the building in their respective floors.
9.
Today, the Respondent No. 2, who is present in the Court, states that she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
10.
The parties are present before this Court in-person today, and have been identified by their Counsel and Investigating Officer concerned and they have entered into the Settlement voluntarily and without any fear and coercion and undertake to remain bound by the terms of the said Settlement. 11.
Considering the nature of the allegations and that they have settled the matter, the FIR No. 254/2022, under Section 354(B)/509/506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar and all the consequential proceedings The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
emanating therefrom are quashed.
12.
The Petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending Application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J DECEMBER 15, 2025/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.