Dhanjay Kumar Sriwastwa v. State Of NCT Of Dlehi & ANR

$~4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ DHANANJAY SRIWASTWA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Srivastava, Advocate

Versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State with SI Rajesh Kumar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 30.07.2018 The allegations in the FIR no.68/18 of police station Kotla Mubarakpur make out a case involving an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC. As per the complainant, the petitioner had engaged her in physical relationship on the premise of marriage for a prolonged period but later had gone back on that assurance when he had entered into an "engagement" with another girl. The allegations relate to March-June, 2016 onwards.

The FIR was lodged on 03.03.2018. The petitioner was granted interim protection by order dated 12.04.2018.

The Investigation confirms that he has joined investigation.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances a case for release

of the applicant on anticipatory bail is made out. Thus, it is directed that in the event of the petitioner being arrested, he shall be released on bail by the arresting officer on furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to the following further conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall continue cooperating with the investigation and join the same as and when called upon to do so; (ii) The petitioner shall not come in contact with or try to influence any of the witnesses connected to the case;

(iii) Prior to his release, he shall give the telephone numbers of self and of at least one other responsible family member besides that of the surety to the investigating officer;

(iv) He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

(v).

He shall not leave India without the prior permission of the court of cognizance or the trial court, as the case may be, and to ensure due compliance with this condition and shall deposit his passport, if he holds one, with the said court; and This order will inure only till the date of first appearance of the petitioner in the event of a charge-sheet being filed on conclusion of the investigation and process being issued against him by the court of cognizance.

The petition stands disposed of in above terms. Dasti.

R.K.GAUBA, J.

JULY 30, 2018 yg