Rajesh @ Tinku v. State

$~40 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1041/2018 RAJESH @ TINKU ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC.

SI Rahul Kumar, PS Kalkaji.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 11.04.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report filed. It is taken on record. Address of the petitioner has been verified and confirmed.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 26.03.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `1,000/-. Crl.A.850/2011 was dismissed by this Court on 15.09.2016. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone three years, seven months and twenty-three days incarceration besides remission for seven months and fifteen days as on 23.03.2018. It further reveals that he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. Earlier he was granted bail and there are no allegations of its misuse.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J APRIL 11, 2018 / tr