Vijender Kumar v. The State (Govt.Of NCT Of Delhi)& ANR

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1070/2018 VIJENDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.Siddharth Chaturvedi, Advocate with Petitioner in person versus THE STATE (GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR ..... Respondents Represented by:

Ms.Purnima Malik, Advocate for Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State with SI Nishant, PS Sonia Vihar Mr.Om Prakash Singh, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 31.07.2018 1.

By this petition, petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.113/2016 under Sections 420/468/471 IPC registered at PS Sonia Vihar on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that parties have settled the matter.

2.

Learned proxy counsel for learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on instructions submits that in the above noted FIR petitioner is the only accused and the respondent No.2 is the only complainant/ victim. W.P.(CRL) 1070/2018

3.

Respondent No. 2 who is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel and Investigating Officer states that he has settled the matter with the petitioner vide compromise deed dated 26th September, 2017. He further states that he does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto and undertakes to abide by the terms of settlement.

4.

Petitioner who is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel affirms the statement of respondent No.2 and undertakes to abide by the terms of settlement.

5.

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

6.

Consequently, FIR No.113/2016 under Sections 420/468/471 IPC registered at PS Sonia Vihar and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

7.

Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

8.

Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

JULY 31, 2018 mamta W.P.(CRL) 1070/2018